Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Participatory Demonstration of Durum Wheat Production Blending Vertisols Management Technologies in Lume District, East Shewa, Ethiopia

Received: 24 May 2024     Accepted: 17 June 2024     Published: 15 July 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Durum wheat production on Vertisols is constrained by waterlogging, where excessive soil moisture limits nutrient availability, resulting in lower yields and higher input demand. Aybar broad bed maker (BBM) was recommended to make broad beds and furrows (BBF) and drain the excess water although it is not widely adopted by farmers. Therefore, this demonstration activity was conducted to create awareness about the importance of BBF along with the recommended fertilizer rates in Lume district during the 2021 and 2022 main cropping seasons. Nine target farmers were purposefully selected based on the ground that their farms are waterlogged Vertisols. Aybar BBM to make the BBF with an 80 cm bed and 20 cm furrow width, while recommended fertilizers at a rate of 92 kg ha-1 nitrogen (N) and 10 kg ha-1 phosphorous (P) were used. The yield data and farmers’ perception were analyzed using t-test, descriptive statistics, and narration, while partial budget analysis was conducted to examine the economic feasibility of the technologies. Results showed that growing durum wheat on BBF by applying the recommended N and P rates resulted in significantly higher grain yield (3474 kg ha-1) with a 65.4% yield advantage compared to ridge and furrow (RF) (2100 kg ha-1) with the blanket fertilizer rates. The partial budget analysis revealed that land preparation using Aybar BBM, alongside the recommended fertilizer rates, brought a net benefit of 48,563 ETB ha-1 over the farmers' practice. Likewise, the marginal rate of return for changing from the local plow to Aybar BBM is 901.7%. The farmers also witnessed that the Aybar BBM even takes less plowing time and energy, and they want to continue to use it. In light of these results, the study concludes that the use of Aybar BBM and recommended N and P rates, as a production package on waterlogged Vertisols, is profitable for farmers and recommends promoting and scaling up these technologies in the study area and other waterlogged Vertisols regions of the country.

Published in International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 9, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijae.20240904.12
Page(s) 203-209
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Aybar BBM, Farmers’ Perception, Fertilizer Rate, Water Logging

References
[1] Teklu Erkossa, Stahr K., and Gaiser T. 2006. Soil tillage and crop productivity on Vertisols in Ethiopian highlands. Soil and Tillage Research 85(1-2): 200–211.
[2] Amare Aleminew Wubie. 2015. Review on Vertisol Management for the Improvement of Crop Productivity in Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 5(12): 92-103.
[3] Setter, T. L., and Waters, I. 2003. Review of prospects for germplasm improvement for waterlogging tolerance in wheat, barley and oats. Plant and Soil, 253(1): 1-34.
[4] Olgun, Murat, Metin Kumlay, A., Cemal Adiguzel, Mesut and Caglar, Abdullah. 2008. The effect of waterlogging in wheat (T. aestivum L.). Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Plant Soil Science, 58(3): 193-198.
[5] Hasanuzzaman, M.; Mahmud, J. A.; Nahar, K.; Anne, T. I.; Inafuku, M.; Oku, H.; Fujita, M. 2017. Responses, adaptation, and ROS metabolism in plants exposed to waterlogging stress. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Systems in Plants: Role and Regulation under Abiotic Stress. pp. 257–281.
[6] Bali, A. S.; Sidhu, G. P. S. 2019. Abiotic stress-induced oxidative stress in wheat. Wheat Production in Changing Environments. pp. 225–239.
[7] Abiye Astatke and Jabbar, M. A. 2001. Low-cost animal-drawn implements for Vertisol management and strategies for land-use intensification. In The sustainable management of Vertisols. Wallingford UK: CABI. pp. 189-201.
[8] Tekalign Mamo and Mohamed-Saleem MA. 2001. Soil and water research in Ethiopia. In: Dubale P, Dibabe A, Zeleke A, Ayele G, Kirub A, editors. Advances in Vertisols management in the Ethiopian highlands. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vertisol Managegment, 28 November–1 December 2000, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Debre Zeit (Ethiopia): EARO. pp. 13–18.
[9] Abayneh Wubetu. 2017. A review on Vertisol management, challenges and future potential for food self-sufficiency in Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 7(17): 115-127.
[10] Getachew Agegnehu and Woldeyesus Sinebo. 2012. Drainage, sowing date and variety effects on chickpea grown on a Vertisol in Ethiopia, Archives of Agronomy and Soil science, 58: 1, 101-113.
[11] Ali Yimer. 1992. Nitrogen transformation in some Ethiopian highland Vertisols. PhD thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwth, UK. pp 174.
[12] Tadesse Debele and Birhanu Iticha. 2017. Effects of drain depth of Vertisols, nitrogen source and time of application on nutrient uptake by maize (Zea mays L.) in western Ethiopia. International journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology. 7(1): 1-7.
[13] Hillette Hailu, Tekalign Mamo, Riikka Keskinen, Erik Karltun, Heluf Gebrekidan, and Taye Bekele. 2015. Soil fertility status and wheat nutrient content in Vertisol cropping systems of central highlands of Ethiopia. Agriculture & Food Security, 4: 1-10.
[14] Tekalign Mamo, Richter C., Heiligtag B. 2002. Phosphorus availability studies on ten Ethiopian Vertisols. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics, 103(2): 177-183
[15] Gezahegn Ayele, Jabbar, M. A. and Elias Zerfu. 2001. Diffusion and adoption of Verisols technology package in highland Ethiopia. pp: 263-272.
[16] Addis Tiruneh, Teklu Tesfaye, Mwangi W, Verkuijl H. 2001. Gender Differentials in Agricultural Production and Decision-Making among Smallholders in Ada, Lume, and Gimbichu Woredas of the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Mexico, D. F.: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO).
[17] Jutzi, S. and Mesfin Abebe. 1987. Improved agricultural utilization of Vertisols in the Ethiopian highlands- an inter-institutional approach: Proceedings of the first regional seminar on management of Vertisols under semi-arid conditions held in Nairobi, Kenya 1-6 Dec. 1986. pp. 173-183.
[18] Belyaev, V. I., Silantyeva, M. M., Meinel, T., Grunwald, L. C., Belyaev, D. V., Kozhanov, N. A., Sokolova, L. V. 2020. Field Days for Technology Transfer and Knowledge Exchange of Dealers and Farmers. KULUNDA: Climate Smart Agriculture: South Siberian Agro-steppe as Pioneering Region for Sustainable Land Use, pp. 493-500.
[19] Emerick, K., and Dar, M. H. 2021. Farmer Field Days and Demonstrator Selection for Increasing Technology Adoption. Review of Economics and Statistics, 103(4): 680–693.
[20] R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL
[21] CIMMYT Economics Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. 1988. From agronomic data to farmer recommendations: an economics-training manual. CIMMYT, Mexico.
[22] Tadesse Debele and Haile Deressa. 2016. Integrated Management of Vertisols for Crop Production in Ethiopia: A Review. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 6(24): 2224-3208.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Fetene, S., Ahmed, M., Gonfa, A., Amsalu, S. (2024). Participatory Demonstration of Durum Wheat Production Blending Vertisols Management Technologies in Lume District, East Shewa, Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 9(4), 203-209. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20240904.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Fetene, S.; Ahmed, M.; Gonfa, A.; Amsalu, S. Participatory Demonstration of Durum Wheat Production Blending Vertisols Management Technologies in Lume District, East Shewa, Ethiopia. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2024, 9(4), 203-209. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20240904.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Fetene S, Ahmed M, Gonfa A, Amsalu S. Participatory Demonstration of Durum Wheat Production Blending Vertisols Management Technologies in Lume District, East Shewa, Ethiopia. Int J Agric Econ. 2024;9(4):203-209. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20240904.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijae.20240904.12,
      author = {Saba Fetene and Mohamed Ahmed and Assefa Gonfa and Sosena Amsalu},
      title = {Participatory Demonstration of Durum Wheat Production Blending Vertisols Management Technologies in Lume District, East Shewa, Ethiopia
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
      volume = {9},
      number = {4},
      pages = {203-209},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20240904.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20240904.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20240904.12},
      abstract = {Durum wheat production on Vertisols is constrained by waterlogging, where excessive soil moisture limits nutrient availability, resulting in lower yields and higher input demand. Aybar broad bed maker (BBM) was recommended to make broad beds and furrows (BBF) and drain the excess water although it is not widely adopted by farmers. Therefore, this demonstration activity was conducted to create awareness about the importance of BBF along with the recommended fertilizer rates in Lume district during the 2021 and 2022 main cropping seasons. Nine target farmers were purposefully selected based on the ground that their farms are waterlogged Vertisols. Aybar BBM to make the BBF with an 80 cm bed and 20 cm furrow width, while recommended fertilizers at a rate of 92 kg ha-1 nitrogen (N) and 10 kg ha-1 phosphorous (P) were used. The yield data and farmers’ perception were analyzed using t-test, descriptive statistics, and narration, while partial budget analysis was conducted to examine the economic feasibility of the technologies. Results showed that growing durum wheat on BBF by applying the recommended N and P rates resulted in significantly higher grain yield (3474 kg ha-1) with a 65.4% yield advantage compared to ridge and furrow (RF) (2100 kg ha-1) with the blanket fertilizer rates. The partial budget analysis revealed that land preparation using Aybar BBM, alongside the recommended fertilizer rates, brought a net benefit of 48,563 ETB ha-1 over the farmers' practice. Likewise, the marginal rate of return for changing from the local plow to Aybar BBM is 901.7%. The farmers also witnessed that the Aybar BBM even takes less plowing time and energy, and they want to continue to use it. In light of these results, the study concludes that the use of Aybar BBM and recommended N and P rates, as a production package on waterlogged Vertisols, is profitable for farmers and recommends promoting and scaling up these technologies in the study area and other waterlogged Vertisols regions of the country.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Participatory Demonstration of Durum Wheat Production Blending Vertisols Management Technologies in Lume District, East Shewa, Ethiopia
    
    AU  - Saba Fetene
    AU  - Mohamed Ahmed
    AU  - Assefa Gonfa
    AU  - Sosena Amsalu
    Y1  - 2024/07/15
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20240904.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20240904.12
    T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    SP  - 203
    EP  - 209
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-3843
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20240904.12
    AB  - Durum wheat production on Vertisols is constrained by waterlogging, where excessive soil moisture limits nutrient availability, resulting in lower yields and higher input demand. Aybar broad bed maker (BBM) was recommended to make broad beds and furrows (BBF) and drain the excess water although it is not widely adopted by farmers. Therefore, this demonstration activity was conducted to create awareness about the importance of BBF along with the recommended fertilizer rates in Lume district during the 2021 and 2022 main cropping seasons. Nine target farmers were purposefully selected based on the ground that their farms are waterlogged Vertisols. Aybar BBM to make the BBF with an 80 cm bed and 20 cm furrow width, while recommended fertilizers at a rate of 92 kg ha-1 nitrogen (N) and 10 kg ha-1 phosphorous (P) were used. The yield data and farmers’ perception were analyzed using t-test, descriptive statistics, and narration, while partial budget analysis was conducted to examine the economic feasibility of the technologies. Results showed that growing durum wheat on BBF by applying the recommended N and P rates resulted in significantly higher grain yield (3474 kg ha-1) with a 65.4% yield advantage compared to ridge and furrow (RF) (2100 kg ha-1) with the blanket fertilizer rates. The partial budget analysis revealed that land preparation using Aybar BBM, alongside the recommended fertilizer rates, brought a net benefit of 48,563 ETB ha-1 over the farmers' practice. Likewise, the marginal rate of return for changing from the local plow to Aybar BBM is 901.7%. The farmers also witnessed that the Aybar BBM even takes less plowing time and energy, and they want to continue to use it. In light of these results, the study concludes that the use of Aybar BBM and recommended N and P rates, as a production package on waterlogged Vertisols, is profitable for farmers and recommends promoting and scaling up these technologies in the study area and other waterlogged Vertisols regions of the country.
    
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Soil and Water Management Research, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Department of Agricultural Extension and Communication Research, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Department of Soil and Water Management Research, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Department of Soil and Water Management Research, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Sections