| Peer-Reviewed

Role of Social Capital on Livelihood Strategies, Food Security and Income of Rural Households in Salale, Oromia, Ethiopia

Received: 26 June 2023    Accepted: 27 July 2023    Published: 20 September 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of social capital on rural households' income, food security, and livelihood strategies in Ethiopia's North Shea Zone. Utilizing questionnaires to gather data from 400 sample houses, descriptive statistics and econometric methods were used to analyze the results. The influence of the degree of social capital (trust and social organization) on the decision to choose one or more different livelihood strategies, household’s income, and food security was examined using a multinomial endogenous switching model (MESM). Depending on the answers to various questions posed to gauge the level of trust, and participation on social organizations were determined. The extent of trust is classified as high, medium, and low while extent of participation is classified as very high, high, medium and low levels. On the other hand, the MESM model divided the available livelihood possibilities into four categories: farming only, farming and non-farming, farming and off-farming, and farming, non-farming, and off-farming livelihood strategies. The estimated results show that high and very high levels of engagement in the social organization of the sample households boost farm households' total farm income and food security status in comparison to low level participant households. At a 1% chance level, this difference is statistically significant. High levels of social trust in the community considerably boost total farm income and food security for households at a 1% probability level when compared to farm households with low levels of social trust. The impact analysis of mean comparison reveals that very high level participation in local social organizations increases the farm households' livelihood diversification strategies by 40% over those of low participant households, while medium trust in the community did not demonstrate any significant relationships. A farmer with a high level of social trust in his community diversified his income sources by 59% more than a farmer with a low level of trust, which is statistically significant at his 5% level The results of this study therefore have important implications for both the well-being and living standards of beneficiaries, as well as the policies and measures that policy makers use to design strategies to improve rural livelihoods. It is also expected to have a significant impact on policy inputs.

Published in International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 8, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijae.20230805.11
Page(s) 168-181
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Trust Social Capital, Livelihood, Diversification Strategies, Multinomial Endogenous Switching Model, North Showa Zone, Ethiopia

References
[1] Abenakyo, A., Sanginga, P., Njuki, J. Kaaria, S. & Delve, R. (2007). Relationship between Social Capital and Livelihood Enhancing Capitals among Smallholder Farmers in Uganda, AAAE Conference Proceedings, 539-541.
[2] Maria I., Brain W., and Rose E. 2019. Left out: Trust and social capital among seasonal workers, Pasific Lutheran University.
[3] Minamoto, Y. (2010). Social capital and livelihood recovery: post-tsunami Sri Lanka as a case. Disaster Prevention and Management, 19 (5), 548-564.
[4] Bourdieu, Pierre (1986) ‘The forms of capital’ in J. G. Richardson. Westport (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, CT: Greenwood Press, 241-258.
[5] Ellis, F. (2000). The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 51, 289–302.
[6] Putnam. R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Touchstone.
[7] Snider, A., Afonso-Gallegos, A., Gutiérrez, I. & Sibelet, N. 2017. Social capital and sustainable coffee certifications in Costa Rica. Human Ecology, 45 (2): 235-249.
[8] Elinor Ostrom and K. Ahn, 2007. The Meaning of Social Capital and Its Link to Collective Action. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1304823
[9] Olson Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
[10] North, D. C., 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Simon and Schuster.
[11] Uphoff, Norman. 2000. Understanding Social Capital: Learning from the Analysis and Experience of Participation. In Partha Dasgupta and Ismail Serageldin (eds.), Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, Washington, D. C.: World Bank.
[12] Bebbington, A. 1999. Capitals and Capabilities: A Framework for Analyzing Peasant Viability, Rural Livelihoods and Poverty. World Development, 27: 2021-2044.
[13] Sibhatu KT, Qaim M. 2018. Review: Meta-analysis of the association between production diversity, diets, and nutrition in smallholder farm households. Food Policy 77: 1–18.
[14] Rikodi C. 2001. Forget planning, put politics first? Priorities for urban management in developing countries. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geo-information. DOI: 10.1016/S0303-2434(01)85029-7. Corpus ID: 140608925.
[15] Barrett CB, Reardon T, Webb P. 2001. Non-farm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Food Pol. 2001; 26 (4): 315–31.
[16] Bain, K. and Hicks, N. 1998., Building Social Capital and Reaching Out to Excluded Groups: The Challenge of Partnerships.” Paper presented at CELAM meeting on The Struggle Against Poverty Towards the Turn of the Millenium, Washington D. C.
[17] Mesbahuddin Chowdhury, Girish Prayag, Caroline Orchiston, Samuel Spector 2018. Postdisaster Social Capital, Adaptive Resilience and Business Performance of Tourism Organizations in Christchurch, New Zealand, Volume 58, Issue. https://doi.org/10.1177 /0047287518794319
[18] Boix, C., & Posner, D. N. (1998). Social Capital: Explaining Its Origins and Effects on Government Performance. British Journal of Political Science, 28, 686-693. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123498000313
[19] Torbjørn Å. And Bharat B. 2012. Contribution of Rural Roads to Access to-and Participation in Markets: Theory and Results from Northern Ethi Sitkin and Roth, 1993opia. Kathmandu, Nepal.
[20] IFPRI. 2015. Global Food and Nutrition Report. IFPRI, Washington, DC.
[21] Peter Walker. 2013, Famine Early Warning Systems: Victims and destitution. Pub. Location London.
[22] Daniel Chernilo. 2013. Poverty and Health: A Crisis Among America's Most Vulnerable.
[23] Granovetter. 2008. The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (1): 33-50.
[24] Akbari, M. A. 2020. Historical Approch on Social Capital Theory; Formation and Evolution. Journal of Historical Sociology.
[25] Bourdieu, P. 1986. The Forms of Capital. In: J. G. Richardson (ed), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology education, New York: Greenwood, pp. 241-258.
[26] Kevin Michael Fitzpatrick. 2013. Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups.
[27] George A. Barnett. 2011. Encyclopedia of Social Networks. Sage publications ltd. India.
[28] World Bank. 2000. World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty. New York: Oxford University Pres.
[29] Portes, Alejandro and Patricia Landolt. 2000. Social capital: promise and pitfalls of its role.
[30] Devereux, S., Amdissa Teshome and Sabates-Wheeler, R., 2005. Too much inequality or too little? inequality and stagnation in Ethiopian agriculture’, IDS Bulletin, 36 (2): 121-126.
[31] Geremew Worku Kassie, Sangho Kim and Francisco P. Fellizar. 2017. Determinant factors of livelihood diversification: Evidence from Ethiopia. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 23311886. 2017.1369490
[32] Asmamaw, D. 2004. Rural Livelihoods, Poverty, and Food Security in Ethiopia: A case Study at Social Sciences and Technology Management, Trondheim.
[33] Dietz, T. 2000. Poverty and land degradation. Paper for the conference on World poverty: A challenge for the private sector. October 3-4, 2000, Amsterdam.
[34] Stephen Devereux and Bruce Guenther. 2007. Institute of development studies, university of sussex, country case study paper prepared for a review commissioned by the FAO on ‘Social Protection and Support to Small Farmer Development.
[35] Ellis, F. 2004. Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
[36] Negash, A. 2001. Diversity and conservation of enset (Ensete ventricosum Welw. Cheesman) and its relation to household food and livelihood security in South-western Ethiopia. PhD Thesis, Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University.
[37] Fredu N., Erik M., Josef D. and Eric T. 2009. Gender, social capital and empowerment in northern Ethiopia, MPRA Paper No. 24629. Mekelle University.
[38] Lewicki RJ, Tomlinson EC, Gillespie N. Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. Journal of management. 2006 Dec; 32 (6): 991-1022.
[39] Lewicki, Roy J., Daniel J. McAllister, and Robert J. Bies. "Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities." Academy of management Review 23, no. 3 (1998): 438-458.
[40] Mayer, Roger C., James H. Davis, and F. David Schoorman. "An integrative model of organizational trust." Academy of management review 20.3 (1995): 709-734.
[41] Rousseau, Denise M., et al. "Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust." Academy of management review 23.3 (1998): 393-404.
[42] Bill, and Marco Tortoriello. "Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations." Journal of Trust Research 1.1 (2011): 23-63.
[43] Bill, Vincenzo Perrone, and Akbar Zaheer. "Trust as an organizing principle." Organization science 14.1 (2003): 91-103.
[44] Hanifan, Lyda J. "The rural school community center." The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 67.1 (1916): 130-138.
[45] Li, Jialin, Ellis Michael, and Dan RK Ports. "Eris: Coordination-free consistent transactions using in-network concurrency control." Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. 2017.
[46] Nkegbe, Paul Kwame, Benjamin Musah Abu, and Haruna Issahaku. "Food security in the Savannah Accelerated Development Authority Zone of Ghana: an ordered probit with household hunger scale approach." Agriculture & Food Security 6.1 (2017): 1-11.
[47] Mekonnen, Daniel Ayalew, and Nicolas Gerber. "Aspirations and food security in rural Ethiopia." Food Security 9.2 (2017): 371-385.
[48] Everton, S. F. and Schroeder, R., 2019. Plagues, Pagans, and Christians: Differential Survival, Social Networks, and the Rise of Christianity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 58 (4), pp. 775-789.
[49] Harrison, J. L., Montgomery, C. A. and Bliss, J. C., 2016. Beyond the monolith: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital in the cycle of adaptive capacity. Society & Natural Resources, 29 (5), pp. 525-539.
[50] Putnam, R. D., 2007. E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty‐first century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian political studies, 30 (2), pp. 137-174.
[51] Bayat, M., 2005. How family members' perceptions of influences and causes of autism may predict assessment of their family quality of life. Loyola University Chicago.
[52] Bozionelos, N., 2006. Mentoring and expressive network resources: Their relationship with career success and emotional exhaustion among Hellenes employees involved in emotion work. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17 (2), pp. 362-378.
[53] Lesser, E., 2009. Knowledge and social capital. Routledge.
[54] Aghdaci, A. A., 2020. Social Capital in Political Development in Iran: Hashemi, Khatami, and Ahmadinejad's Presidencies. Lexington Books.
[55] McNall, S. G., 2015. The problem of social inequality: Why it destroys democracy, threatens the planet, and what we can do about it. Routledge.
[56] Nyqvist, F., Forsman, A. K., Giuntoli, G. and Cattan, M., 2013. Social capital as a resource for mental well-being in older people: A systematic review. Aging & mental health, 17 (4), pp. 394-410.
[57] Forsyth, P. B. and Adams, C. M., 2004. Social capital in education. Educational administration, policy, and reform: Research and measurement, 251.
[58] Häuberer, J., 2010. Towards the Methodological Foundation of Social Capital Theory. How (not) to Measure it in the Czech Republic.
[59] Bowles, S. 2008. Social preferences and public economics: Mechanism design when social preferences depend on incentives. Journal of public economics, 92 (8-9), pp. 1811-1820.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Gari Duguma, Fekadu Beyane, Mengistu Ketema, Kediri Jemal, Beyan Ahmed. (2023). Role of Social Capital on Livelihood Strategies, Food Security and Income of Rural Households in Salale, Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 8(5), 168-181. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20230805.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Gari Duguma; Fekadu Beyane; Mengistu Ketema; Kediri Jemal; Beyan Ahmed. Role of Social Capital on Livelihood Strategies, Food Security and Income of Rural Households in Salale, Oromia, Ethiopia. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2023, 8(5), 168-181. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20230805.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Gari Duguma, Fekadu Beyane, Mengistu Ketema, Kediri Jemal, Beyan Ahmed. Role of Social Capital on Livelihood Strategies, Food Security and Income of Rural Households in Salale, Oromia, Ethiopia. Int J Agric Econ. 2023;8(5):168-181. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20230805.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijae.20230805.11,
      author = {Gari Duguma and Fekadu Beyane and Mengistu Ketema and Kediri Jemal and Beyan Ahmed},
      title = {Role of Social Capital on Livelihood Strategies, Food Security and Income of Rural Households in Salale, Oromia, Ethiopia},
      journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
      volume = {8},
      number = {5},
      pages = {168-181},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20230805.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20230805.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20230805.11},
      abstract = {The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of social capital on rural households' income, food security, and livelihood strategies in Ethiopia's North Shea Zone. Utilizing questionnaires to gather data from 400 sample houses, descriptive statistics and econometric methods were used to analyze the results. The influence of the degree of social capital (trust and social organization) on the decision to choose one or more different livelihood strategies, household’s income, and food security was examined using a multinomial endogenous switching model (MESM). Depending on the answers to various questions posed to gauge the level of trust, and participation on social organizations were determined. The extent of trust is classified as high, medium, and low while extent of participation is classified as very high, high, medium and low levels. On the other hand, the MESM model divided the available livelihood possibilities into four categories: farming only, farming and non-farming, farming and off-farming, and farming, non-farming, and off-farming livelihood strategies. The estimated results show that high and very high levels of engagement in the social organization of the sample households boost farm households' total farm income and food security status in comparison to low level participant households. At a 1% chance level, this difference is statistically significant. High levels of social trust in the community considerably boost total farm income and food security for households at a 1% probability level when compared to farm households with low levels of social trust. The impact analysis of mean comparison reveals that very high level participation in local social organizations increases the farm households' livelihood diversification strategies by 40% over those of low participant households, while medium trust in the community did not demonstrate any significant relationships. A farmer with a high level of social trust in his community diversified his income sources by 59% more than a farmer with a low level of trust, which is statistically significant at his 5% level The results of this study therefore have important implications for both the well-being and living standards of beneficiaries, as well as the policies and measures that policy makers use to design strategies to improve rural livelihoods. It is also expected to have a significant impact on policy inputs.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Role of Social Capital on Livelihood Strategies, Food Security and Income of Rural Households in Salale, Oromia, Ethiopia
    AU  - Gari Duguma
    AU  - Fekadu Beyane
    AU  - Mengistu Ketema
    AU  - Kediri Jemal
    AU  - Beyan Ahmed
    Y1  - 2023/09/20
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20230805.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20230805.11
    T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    SP  - 168
    EP  - 181
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-3843
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20230805.11
    AB  - The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of social capital on rural households' income, food security, and livelihood strategies in Ethiopia's North Shea Zone. Utilizing questionnaires to gather data from 400 sample houses, descriptive statistics and econometric methods were used to analyze the results. The influence of the degree of social capital (trust and social organization) on the decision to choose one or more different livelihood strategies, household’s income, and food security was examined using a multinomial endogenous switching model (MESM). Depending on the answers to various questions posed to gauge the level of trust, and participation on social organizations were determined. The extent of trust is classified as high, medium, and low while extent of participation is classified as very high, high, medium and low levels. On the other hand, the MESM model divided the available livelihood possibilities into four categories: farming only, farming and non-farming, farming and off-farming, and farming, non-farming, and off-farming livelihood strategies. The estimated results show that high and very high levels of engagement in the social organization of the sample households boost farm households' total farm income and food security status in comparison to low level participant households. At a 1% chance level, this difference is statistically significant. High levels of social trust in the community considerably boost total farm income and food security for households at a 1% probability level when compared to farm households with low levels of social trust. The impact analysis of mean comparison reveals that very high level participation in local social organizations increases the farm households' livelihood diversification strategies by 40% over those of low participant households, while medium trust in the community did not demonstrate any significant relationships. A farmer with a high level of social trust in his community diversified his income sources by 59% more than a farmer with a low level of trust, which is statistically significant at his 5% level The results of this study therefore have important implications for both the well-being and living standards of beneficiaries, as well as the policies and measures that policy makers use to design strategies to improve rural livelihoods. It is also expected to have a significant impact on policy inputs.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

  • School of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Economic Association, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • School of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

  • School of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

  • Sections